Holdings: Semantic Response Consistency and Protocol Validity in Structured Personality Assessment: The Case of the NEO–PI–R.

Semantic Response Consistency and Protocol Validity in Structured Personality Assessment: The Case of the NEO–PI–R.

In this study we tested the hypothesis that groups of NEO Personality Inventory–Revised (NEO–PI–R; Costa & McCrae, 1992a) protocols identified as potentially invalid by an inconsistency scale (INC; Schinka, Kinder,&Kremer, 1997) would show reduced reliability and validity according to a series of ps...

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Kurtz, John E., Parrish, Catherine L.
Format:	Villanova Faculty Authorship
Language:	English
Published:	2001
Online Access:	http://ezproxy.villanova.edu/login?url=https://digital.library.villanova.edu/Item/vudl:177843

Main Authors:

Kurtz, John E., Parrish, Catherine L.

Format:

Villanova Faculty Authorship

Language:

English

Published:

2001

Online Access:

http://ezproxy.villanova.edu/login?url=https://digital.library.villanova.edu/Item/vudl:177843

The Digital Library strives to provide access to its collections and resources to the Villanova University community and the global community of scholars, subject to any intellectual property or other restrictions on use. Certain materials, such as historical documents, handwritten materials, and foreign language materials, present unique accessibility challenges and formatting limitations. If you are experiencing difficulties in accessing, viewing, or navigating the Digital Library, please contact us at digitallibrary@villanova.edu or 610.519.5271.

Semantic Response Consistency and Protocol Validity in Structured Personality Assessment: The Case of the NEO–PI–R.

Internet

Accessibility

Semantic Response Consistency and Protocol Validity in Structured Personality Assessment: The Case of the NEO–PI–R.

Internet

Similar Items

Accessibility