Activate Javascript or update your browser for the full Digital Library experience.
Previous Page
–
Next Page
OCR
‘:2. oftl,eA.R&1IBISHOPSQf.Z1R ‘I FDMA
.> I A b thg E ime of the Burgelfesand Clergy o u 122
own Primate: AS 5fPPc"r5 Y 1,5, in behalf of their elect Biihop, G.”X")"
to R0d"lPl” Ahchblmop of Camlfr Biflyio s of Ireland haV6 great Indlgnatb" to.”
1: Know eyou for Tmth..tl1at‘t e R ofllnl who dwellcth at Armagb -, becaufe
“ ward U5 E “d ‘hat Blmtip mg‘ 'ons, but will alwaY5 be under WU’ G0‘
“ W5 ‘‘'m not fubmit 0 their Oldldmtlzat continue loflgi For “Po” the I“trOduc'
“ Vernment.” But dug Iegloufl 1 iii 1152 the Bifhopsboth of Duliliiz, Wa4V
tion of thc Pans bi Cgnhhnfliaffipnzaapplied do more to the Sec of Canterbury for
. ' l‘ o , - - -
:C<r'>fr:i‘c:.icr::i[ii1odJ;mie'<:1i‘1a(i;- yyrere the generality of the BifhOP5 of Inland from fubmmmg
to an foreign Juri i ion. Ta V .- nlmyd keet thg No.
HZ proceeds to fhewa that as the lsiinzCtr,1e:iirric(lvlr’IeoIy3Il:::n(c1>:;Ifo itdothgot appmy
mination of Archbilhops and Billions in tthat an Virmtions of the Clergy were
by any :ipprovedlRecor;1l 011: or that fmy Indulgences were fought by
held here antient y in t c 0 f . a - . ‘ ‘ r 1, arcri‘
me no at his Hmds- .1-It tun“ “ “W “““?“i“"”;‘3i2$":2‘i‘I:vi";Zt$ned
bad to St Pamck’ whcrcm Plmgam” and nllwf Zmand St- Patrick twelve Years‘
or thirf)’ Years of lndlflgences frat?‘ ?0Pef tyit J:iG:.1t1,kS of G-Iajlmbury As to that
fwm Pol” C‘W‘’‘’ ‘5 “ me" F‘&l0n O t- C h C t Libmr and out" of the
Qlotatlo“ out of an old Book of Canons 1.“ t 6 05-0“ nd‘I;;ninu5 ‘ “ that
Acts of a Synod faid to be held by St. l’atrzck, Aux: rm, a f I I "do let it be
if any Caufe be too diliicult for the l)ecilion of the Primacy 0 . re at . Ore IE3.
referred to the Apoltolick See.” If it be noeforged, yet it Prove: D1? nlinha 0%
that St. Patrick had a fpecial Regard to the Piety and L6=g"mg‘;i t C f 1] ‘;P5d;t
Rome in thofe Days, from whence he W2.1S.l‘ent- for th(e:h onlyer onho h r: :17! E
but it is no Proof, that he fancied an Infallibility ifn that ' urc - 2 311' t at dCgV‘:St0
Opinion-, that the Church of Rome lhould ever a ter ccantinue Inf at goo E a’e,
or mould ajways be exempt from Error. As to the A ertions o Coppmger, viz.
as that Ireland, as Brzroniu: writes, was abfolved from the Pelagzaviz ‘I-Ierefy by the
to Church of Ram -," and again “ that the Bifhops of lreland, being infected by
“ the Pelagian Error, fought Abfolution Firf’t of Ptlagz-u.:,the Pope; but that the
“ fame was not effe6tually done, until St. Gregory did It. . Ht: fllcws Chef: t0:be
Dreams of Cappit:gcr‘s own. Head; and that neither Baromur, nor any other Au-
thor writes; that the Irill: Blfhops fought Abfolution from P0?C Pelagiur, or that
they had any thing to do with St. Grcgory, in any Matter relating to the Pelogmn
Herefy: That St. Gregorfs Epiltle treats only on the Controverfy of the three
Chapters, which were Condemned by the 5th gencralCounc11 ;- of which Barom-
u; h lays “ that all the Bifhops of Ireland eagerly ftood up in Defence of the
“ three Chapters ; and when they perceived that the Church of Rome received the
Condemnation of the three Chapters, they departed from her, and adhered to
the red of the Schifmaticks, that were in Italy, Africk, or 0th
animated with that vain Confidence ; that they itood for the (la
while they defended thefe Things that were concluded in the Co
radon.” From whence may be collected, that the
take all the Refolutions of the Church of Rome for un
they thought they had good Reafon for doing fo,
other Churches before it.
I
0
er Countries,
tholick Faith,
uncil of. Chal-
Bilhops of Ireland did not
doubted Oraclcs; but when
they preferred the Judgment of
a
as
It
' e Ifidore'Mcreator', M. S. in Bib. Cott. ad Calccm. f Synod. Patr. Auxilii 8: Ifemihi,‘
publifhed by Wm. g Mnemofynum to the Cath: of Ire. lib. 2. ch. 3. , li Ann. Tom.
,7. No. :1. . - . . t t